Баардык финансылык мекемелерге жана финансылык эмес категориядагы жактарга

30-август, 2023-жыл.

Россия Федерациясынын вето укугу Коопсуздук Кеңешинин саякатка тыюу салууну узарта албашына жана Малидеги тынчтык келишимине тоскоол болгон адамдардын мүлкүн тоңдурууга алып келди. Коопсуздук Кеңеши бүгүн 2374 (2017) резолюциясы менен 2015-жылы Малиде тынчтык жана элдешүү келишимин аткарууга тоскоол болгон адамдарга жана уюмдарга киргизилген саякатка тыюу салууну жана активдерди тоңдурууну узарта алган жок, бул чараларды Бириккен Улуттар Уюмунун Малидеги стабилдештирүү боюнча көп тармактуу комплекстүү миссиясынын кыскарышынын фонунда күчүндө кармап турган эки резолюциянын бири боюнча консенсуска келе алган жок (минус).Франция жана Бириккен Араб Эмираттары тарабынан сунушталган биринчи долбоор 31-жылдын 2024-августуна чейин саякатка тыюу салууну жана активдерди тоңдурууну, ошондой эле 30-жылдын 2024-сентябрына чейин 2374 (2017) резолюциясында каралган эксперттер тобунун мандатын узартууну талап кылган. Бирок, ал добуш берүүдө Россия Федерациясы тарабынан коюлган вето үчүн четке кагылды, анда 13 адам добуш берип, 1 адам калыс болду (Кытай). Ветону пайдалануу бул кырдаал боюнча 10 жумушчу күндүн ичинде Башкы Ассамблеянын расмий жыйынын чакырууга алып келет. (Толук маалымат алуу үчүн ЖК / 12417 пресс-релизин караңыз .) Добуш берүү алдында сүйлөп жатып, Бириккен Араб Эмираттарынын өкүлү миссиянын санын коопсуз жана иреттүү түрдө кыскартуу үчүн туруктуу чөйрөнү сактоо зарылдыгын баса белгиледи. Ал резолюциянын демөөрчүлөрү долбоорду даярдоодо Малинин өткөөл Өкмөтүнүн пикирин "кылдат изилдегенин" жана анда Кеңештин санкцияларды улантуу маселесин каалаган убакта кайра карап чыгууга даярдыгы баса белгиленгенин кошумчалады.Добуш берүүдөн кийин Мозамбиктин өкүлү, ошондой эле Габон менен Ганадан чыгып сүйлөп, вето колдонулгандыктан резолюциянын долбоору кабыл алынбай калганына кейиди. Текстте 2015-жылдагы тынчтык келишимине тоскоол болгон же коркунуч келтиргендерге каршы чаралардын кеңейиши каралган жана Мозамбик, Габон жана Гана өткөөл Өкмөттүн өтүнүчүн тийиштүү түрдө карап чыгышса да, алар "бул этапта чараларды улантуу керек"деген тыянакка келишкен.Улуу Британия, Швейцария, Албания жана Япониянын өкүлдөрү да Орусия Федерациясынын вето укугун колдонгонуна өкүнүп, малиге карата санкциялар режими жана эксперттер тобу Малидеги тынчтыкты жана туруктуулукту колдоодо Кеңештин маанилүү куралы экенин баса белгилешти. Кошмо Штаттардын өкүлү, Кеңештин Төрагасы август айында: "Орусия региондогу өлкөлөрдүн каршылыгына карабай Кеңешке дагы бир жолу өз эркин таңуулады", - деп белгилеген.The Russian Federation’s representative, however, said that — despite his delegation’s repeated calls for sensible compromise — the text did not take into consideration the positions of either his country or Mali.Then, as the Council turned to his country’s competing draft — which would have renewed the travel ban and asset freeze for one final year and dissolved the Panel of Experts — he issued a warning.“If this is not adopted, then there is no coming back to discussing any further resolutions on this matter,” he said.That draft was then defeated by a vote of 1 in favour (Russian Federation) to 1 against (Japan), with 13 abstentions.The representative of France, after the vote, expressed regret that the Russian Federation put forward a text that was not subject to discussion among Council members at a juncture as crucial as this one for Mali and the region.Malta’s representative said that her delegation abstained because this draft sought to eliminate measures that would have assisted Mali on its path to genuine security and stability.China’s representative, meanwhile, said that — although his delegation did not receive instructions from its capital regarding the draft — it supports the content and elements contained within.At the outset of the meeting, Council members engaged in a procedural discussion regarding the holding of consultations before today’s votes.THE SITUATION IN MALIProcedural DiscussionA procedural exchange occurred at the outset of the meeting, with VASSILY A. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) and DAI BING (China) requesting that consultations be held before the vote.ROBERT A. WOOD (United States), Council President for August, while taking note of these positions, said that he will proceed with the vote, given that views have already been expressed and the text is substantively the same as the one that recently passed the silence procedure. Further exchanges followed, and PEDRO COMISSÁRIO AFONSO (Mozambique), also speaking for Gabon and Ghana, said that, while the countries for whom he speaks have taken a common position, they can accept allowing more time for an additional exchange of views. Mr. WOOD then indicated his intention to proceed with the vote, at which time Mr. NEBENZIA asked for a procedural vote on whether to hold consultations.Mr. WOOD then suspended the meeting.Upon resumption, Mr. WOOD said that the Council will hold consultations on the matter and suspended the meeting again.Action on Draft Resolution LANA ZAKI NUSSEIBEH (United Arab Emirates), speaking in explanation of position before action, acknowledged that implementation of the Agreement on Peace and Reconciliation in Mali is facing difficultLANA ZAKI NUSSEIBEH (United Arab Emirates), speaking in explanation of position before action, acknowledged that implementation of the Agreement on Peace and Reconciliation in Mali is facing difficulty. Acknowledging that the drawdown and withdrawal of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) are ongoing and that the first phase of MINUSMA’s drawdown has occurred successfully, she noted: “However, we need to bear in mind that the second phase is still ongoing, and it will be important to maintain as stable an environment as posAcknowledging that the drawdown and withdrawal of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) are ongoing and that the first phase of MINUSMA’s drawdown has occurred successfully, she noted: “However, we need to bear in mind that the second phase is still ongoing, and it will be important to maintain as stable an environment as possible for the sake of achieving a safe and orderly drawdown.” In putting the draft resolution forward, she emphasized that “we have paid careful attention” to the views of Mali’s transitional Government, particularly its request for the lifting of the sanctions regime. The draft resolution emphasizes the Council's readiness to review at any time the continuation of the sanctions measures contained in Council resolution 2374 (2017). Mr. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) said that the meeting had been preceded by good work on the sanctions regime, which met the needs of regional Council players; however, he noted that the draft does address those issues. Adoption of that text, which flouts Bamako’s desire to end the sanctions regime, will simMr. NEBENZIA (Russian Federation) said that the meeting had been preceded by good work on the sanctions regime, which met the needs of regional Council players; however, he noted that the draft does address those issues. Adoption of that text, which flouts Bamako’s desire to end the sanctions regime, will simply undermine it. He recalled that the regime was set up by the Council in response to a specific request by Malian authorities and that attempting to emplace guardianship on that country without the authorities’ agreement is pointless. Pushing forward approaches that are unsuitable to Bamako will hamper further cooperation with the UN, and given current withdrawal of MINUSMA, “we must not allow that”. Therefore, his delegation could not support the draft, urging member States to support its alternative resolution, which takes into consideration the African countries’ view that the regime must be maintained, but not used for foreign influence on Mali. By a vote of 13 in favour to 1 against (Russian Federation), with 1 abstention (China), the Security Council failed to adopt the resolution, owing to a veto cast by a permanent member. Statements Mr. AFONSO (Mozambique), also speaking for Gabon and Ghana, said that, to support international engagement in the political and security situations in Mali, the countries for whom he speaks voted in favour of the draft resolution. The text would have extended measures against those who obstruct or threaten the 2015 peace agreement — implementation of which remains critical for long-term Mr. AFONSO (Mozambique), also speaking for Gabon and Ghana, said that, to support international engagement in the political and security situations in Mali, the countries for whom he speaks voted in favour of the draft resolution. The text would have extended measures against those who obstruct or threaten the 2015 peace agreement — implementation of which remains critical for long-term peace and stability in Mali. While Mozambique, Gabon and Ghana gave due consideration to the transitional Government’s request, they assessed that “at this stage, the measures should continue”, he said Against the backdrop of the potential negative impact of MINUSMA’s withdrawal on the peace agreement, he expressed regret that the draft resolution could not be adopted due to the use of the veto. Now, more than ever, the international community must support and encourage intensified efforts to implement the peace agreement. Mali’s peace, stability and territorial integrity depends — to a large extent — on doing so, he stressed. JAMES KARIUKI (United Kingdom) said that despite having to make a number of difficult compromises, his delegation votedJAMES KARIUKI (United Kingdom) said that despite having to make a number of difficult compromises, his delegation voted in favour of the resolution because of its strong support for the renewal of the Mali sanctions regime and the Panel of Experts mandate. These are important Council tools in sup